Supreme Court's Personal Jurisdiction Ruling Sounds Potential Death Knell to Plaintiff Litigation Forum Shopping


In a momentous 8-1 ruling handed down yesterday, the United States Supreme Court plainly limited the reach of state courts to assert personal jurisdiction over corporate defendants in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of CA, San Francisco County, et al. More »

TEXAS INSURANCE LAW UPDATE: Storm Claim Litigation Reform Statute: Texas House Bill 1774


House Bill 1774 (H.B. No. 1774) was signed by Texas Governor Greg Abbott on May 26, 2017, enacting Chapter 542A of the Texas Insurance Code and modifying other existing statutes. H.B. No. 1774 was designed to address lawsuit abuse arising out of Texas weather-related property claims. A summary of the bill follows. More »

The Uniform Commercial Code May Not Be So Uniform After All: Looking to the U.C.C. as a Defense to Class Certification


The Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.). You know the one. That sectioned charter originally enacted with the goal of unifying the laws governing sales and commercial transactions across all 50 states, the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories? The one that provides recommendations to the states as to the laws that each particular state should adopt? It turns out that –even for all of the states that have adopted the UCC--the “uniform” part of the Code’s title might just be a misnomer . . . and one that might actually provide a defense to businesses defending against class certification. More »

REAL ESTATE CLIENT UPDATE: Michigan Court of Appeals' Recent Decision Reviews What Constitutes a Fixture Under Michigan Law


Image result for "real estate"Introduction

As you may be aware, Michigan has very few cases involving an issue that frequently arises at the end of many tenancies – whether items such as heating system(s), window shades, awnings, storm doors, stoves, etc. constitute fixtures (that remain the Landlord’s property at the end of the tenancy) or personal property (that the Tenant may freely remove at the end of the tenancy).   On May 9, 2017, the Michigan Court of Appeals in Grand Traverse County Land Bank Authority v. Verizon Wireless and Great Northern Broadcasting System, Inc. held that that a broadcasting tower on a 14 acre parcel was a fixture that could not be removed .  A summary of this recent decision (and the Michigan Court of Appeals reasoning on what constitutes a fixture under Michigan law) is below.   More »



Late last week, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey handed down a reversal of summary judgment in an action sure to get the attention of asbestos defendants in the region who rely on similar offerings in moving for summary judgment. In an unpublished opinion, the Court in Fowler v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al.(Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket No. A-2300-15T4), relied on, and hence gave credence to, limitations earlier courts have placed on the ‘substantial factor’ test used to determine if defendant’s product caused plaintiff’s disease. More »

Raising the Bar: Missouri’s New Daubert Law

With the stroke of the pen, Missouri’s newly-minted Republican Governor Eric Greitens has fulfilled a key campaign promise to bring tort reform to the state. On March 28, 2017, Governor Greitens signed legislation aligning Missouri with a large majority of jurisdictions that follow the Daubert standard governing expert testimony and opinion. In adopting the Daubert standard, Missouri leaves the handful of states following neither the Frye nor Daubert standards. The new law allows Missouri litigants to develop expert strategies based on a broad framework of federal precedent and practical jurisprudence from more than thirty states.  More »

Norfolk: Missouri Supreme Court Limits Personal Jurisdiction


On February 28, 2017, the Missouri Supreme Court issued its ruling in State ex rel. Norfolk So. Ry. Co. v. Hon. Colleen Dolan, a watershed moment in Missouri litigation. The ruling entrenches the legal precedent of Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014) in Missouri courtrooms, thereby limiting personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations. In the underlying case, the plaintiff, Russell Parker of Indiana, filed a Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA) claim against Norfolk, a Virginia corporation with its principle place of business in Virginia, for a cumulative trauma injury sustained while working for Norfolk in Indiana. More »

CLIENT ALERT: Labor & Employment Law - Where Do We Stand? U.S. Department of Labor's Revised Overtime Rules Under the Fair Labor Standards Act


A. Overview of Fair Labor Standards Act
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) is a federal law that regulates minimum wage and overtime compensation. Specifically, the FLSA provides a $7.25 per hour minimum wage for all covered employees, and mandates that they be paid time-and-a-half for work in excess of 40 hours per week. More »

CLIENT ALERT: New York’s New Cybersecurity Regulations - Nuts & Bolts


The risk of a cyber-attack is ubiquitous, and a cyber-event can result in legal and financial liabilities that can cripple an affected organization. Recognizing the ever growing threat of cyber-crime, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) recently unveiled the Proposed Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies, a proposed set of cybersecurity regulations for banks, insurers and financial institutions aimed to protect both institutions and individuals from cybersecurity events. Compliance with the regulations is mandatory. The regulations, which take effect January 1, 2017, seek to protect customer information as well as institutions’ information technology systems by requiring covered entities to assess their cyber risk, to implement programs and policies to address that risk, and to continually monitor these systems. This alert will cover the ins and outs of the new regulations including what you can do today. More »

Illinois Supreme Court Applies Discovery Rule Extending Statute of Limitations Period in Wrongful Death and Survival Actions


On September 22, 2016, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its opinion in Randall W. Moon v. Clarissa F. Rhode et al. (2016 IL 119572), holding that the discovery rule found in section 13-212(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/13-212(a)) was applicable to Wrongful Death and Survival act claims alleging medical malpractice.  Generally, statutes of limitation set deadlines for which plaintiffs must bring claims, however, in certain situations the deadline may be extended by what is referred to as the “discovery rule.”  Although the Court’s opinion was in the context of a medical malpractice case, the discovery rule that the Court held to apply in section 13-212(a) of the Code for medical malpractice claims also appears in section 13-213(d) of the Code for product liability claims.  This decision may provide support for plaintiffs and courts in Illinois to extend the application of the discovery rule to Wrongful Death and Survival act claims in product liability matters. More »

Get Updates By Email

Blog Contributors