Employment Update: Illinois Enacts Pregnancy Fairness Act
Effective January 1, 2015, Illinois women will enjoy greater protections under the law because of the Illinois’ Pregnancy Fairness Act. By amending the existing Illinois Human Rights Act, this new law has made pregnancy a protected class.
Pregnancy is now a protected class
As defined in the statute, "pregnancy" means "pregnancy, childbirth, or medical or common conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth." See 775 ILCS 5/1-103(L-5). Thus, the Act covers not only the gestation period but also the period following childbirth.
Generally, the Act makes it illegal to discriminate in hiring and employment against pregnant workers and those affected by a medical or common condition related to pregnancy or childbirth. 775 ILCS 5/2-102(I). While employers will be required to provide a broader range of accommodations to pregnant employees including assistance with manual labor, an employer can refuse to accommodate an employee where it can show that doing so presents an undue hardship on the ordinary operations of the business. See 775 ILCS 5/2-102(J). Perhaps, one of the most radical departures from existing law is the notion that the required 12 weeks of leave under the FMLA may not be sufficient under the Pregnancy Fairness Act; under this new schema, existing FMLA and ADA requirements may be the floor rather than the ceiling.
This applies to you
While other federal laws like the FMLA have varying requirements depending on the size of the employer, this Act does not. There is no exemption under the Pregnancy Fairness Act for employers with fewer than 50 employees.
Men Need Not Apply?
Notably, since the Act discusses these rights through the lens of pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions, the Act does not appear to expand the protections given to expectant fathers. While additional protections for men as well as women would seem to be within the spirit of the Act, whether men are covered remains a largely open question and, likely, will be the subject of litigation in the future.
For tips on how to comply and more information regarding the changes, click here.
Recent Posts
- Placebo Effect: How Illinois’ COVID Tort Immunity Fails to Immunize Medical Professionals and the Healthcare Industry
- Canela V. Sky Chefs – How To Make A Light Duty Offer
- If at First You Do Not Succeed, Try Again Immediately: Illinois Passes Revised Pre-Judgment Interest Statute
- Green Development Risks
- A Question of Timing: Policy-Limit Demands and Insurer Bad Faith in Florida
- CUBI: Everything You Need to Know About Texas' Biometric Law and Beyond...
- Prejudgment Interest Starting as Early as the Time of Injury? At a Rate of 9% Interest? A Bill Sits on Illinois’ Governor’s Desk.
- Now That Vaccine Distribution Has Begun, What Issues Do Employers Face?
- Immunity From Liability For Healthcare Facilities and Healthcare Professionals in the Continuing Battle Against the Covid-19 Pandemic
- A National Approach to Biometric Privacy
Topics
- Professional Liability
- Class Action
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Appellate
- Insurance & Reinsurance Litigation & Counseling
- Insurance Coverage
- Reinsurance
- Cyber Risk & Liability
- Toxic Tort
- Asbestos
- Professional Development
- Transportation
- Workers' Compensation
- Discrimination, Harassment & Hostile Workplace Claims
- Product Liability
- Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Litigation
- Medical Negligence & Healthcare Liability
- Social Media & Privacy
- Employment Litigation & Counseling
- Construction Litigation & Counseling
- Trucking
- Warranty