Showing 68 posts by Administrator.

Five Words & Phrases Defense Attorneys Should be Mindful of in Trucking Litigation

by

Many Americans can name one, two or even more Plaintiff personal injury attorneys in their area. This is no doubt due to the relentless onslaught of billboards, radio, and television ads seducing clients hurt by big bad trucking companies to contact them with promises of a big pay day down the road. Commercial motor vehicle traffic accidents are likewise seen as a payday for Plaintiff attorneys as well. This is because commercial motor vehicle traffic accidents are some of the most difficult cases to defend. When a Plaintiff’s attorney goes to trial against a trucking company, he is not just putting the trucking company named in the complaint on trial, he is putting the whole trucking industry on trial, and it is easy for them to do so due to the misused, misconstrued, and ambiguous language oftentimes associated with the trucking industry. This imprecise usage of language puts attorneys who defend trucking litigation at a clear disadvantage. To achieve equal footing, attorneys who defend commercial trucking clients should identify certain words and phrases that retort a Plaintiff’s theme that improperly places the entire transportation industry on trial. More »

An Examination of the Illinois Insurer-Insured Privilege: What is Protected and What is Discoverable?

by

Introduction
In today’s litigation climate, cases often not only involve a plaintiff, a defendant, and their attorneys, but also insurance carriers who have vested interests in the outcome of cases involving their insured. Prior to and throughout the course of litigation, an insured will often not only communicate with their attorney, but also with their insurer. It is common, for example, that an insurer will take a statement from their insured while analyzing a potential claim. The threshold question of which components of an insurance claim file are discoverable is crucial in a litigated matter. This Article explores the Illinois Insurer-Insured Privilege. A misunderstanding of this privilege can have severe consequences, including the disclosure of material information that the parties believed, in good faith, was confidential, and would never be subject to production. More »

Judge Grants First Summary Judgment Based on Medical Causation in NY County Asbestos Litigation

by

On January 31, 2019, Justice Manuel Mendez issued a decision granting the first summary judgment motion based on medical causation in a New York County Asbestos Litigation (“NYCAL”) case, Thomas Mantovi v. American Biltrite (Index No. 190055/2017). Judge Mendez held that “Amtico floor tiles did not produce breathable dust to a level sufficient to cause decedent’s mesothelioma.” More »

Illinois Appellate Court Concludes that Actual Harm is not Required under Biometric Information Privacy Act

by

An Illinois appellate court’s recent opinion may very well open the flood gates for litigation arising out of alleged violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) by eliminating the need to allege actual harm to have standing to sue. Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 180175. More »

CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: What Companies can Learn from Uber’s Recent $148 Million Settlement

by

On September 26, 2018, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) reached a joint settlement with all 50 states and Washington, D.C.’s attorney generals to pay a record breaking $148 million for its 2016 data breach and subsequent cover-up. More »

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: Physicians Beware: New Jersey Supreme Court Erodes Self-Critical Analysis Privilege

by

A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision has eroded the long held self-critical analysis privilege applicable in New Jersey medical malpractice lawsuits. Health care facilities, physicians and their insurers will likely face increased liability exposure as a result of the Court’s decision in Bugaletta v. Garcia.[1]  Conversely, this decision should benefit patients alleging medical malpractice as they now have a means to obtain a summary of facts relevant to the alleged malpractice.    More »

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: Medical Professionals and Opioid Lawsuits: Protecting Against the Coming Storm

by

The pharmaceutical industry and medical professionals are facing a crisis over opioid prescriptions – which have been a regular part of medical care and pain management for decades.  In 1977, the New England Journal of Medicine published an analysis of opioid medications and associated addiction which found opioid addiction and death to rarely develop from pain management with opioids. Following this publication, the medical industry began to use opioids with greater regularity throughout the 1980’s, 1990’s, and into the present day given their effectiveness in treating patients with both severe short-term and chronic pain. More »

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: The Medical Studies Act: What Happens in Peer Review Does Not Always Stay in Peer Review

by

Medical professionals often face a difficult balancing act when it comes to peer review.  Hindsight is truly 20/20, and it is important for medical professionals to peer review patient and resident care to improve future treatment. However, when inadequate care is provided and a patient or resident is injured, medical professionals face the specter of litigation. How do medical professionals balance between improving future care and protecting themselves from litigation? To help balance these important interests, Illinois has passed both the Medical Studies Act, 735 ILCS 5/8-2101 et seq. (2004), and the Long-Term Care Peer Review and Quality Assessment and Assurance Protection Act, 745 ILCS 55/4 et. seq. (2014) (the “Quality Assessment Act”). While the line between communications protected during peer review and those that are discoverable in litigation is not perfectly clear despite these Acts, there are certain guidelines that peer-review committees can follow to ensure the greatest possibility of protection under the Acts. More »

PA PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case Serves As Reminder To Communicate With Experts

by

In Rutyna v. Schweers, Plaintiffs instituted a legal malpractice action against William Schweers, the attorney who represented them in a medical malpractice action brought against a doctor and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian. The underlying action ensued after Mr. Rutyna underwent a laminectomy that was complicated by a dural tear, a condition that occurs when a surgical instrument nicks the thin covering of the spinal cord. Significantly, the trial court dismissed the Rutynas’ medical malpractice action after they failed to file a Certificate of Merit as required by the Pennsylvania Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Act. More »

Get Updates By Email

Blog Contributors