Showing 13 posts by Chad Layton.
New York will soon take another step forward towards protecting residents’ confidential data. As of March 21, 2020, any company that owns or licenses computer data that contains the private information of a New York resident must implement and maintain reasonable measures to protect that information. This new legislation impacts any business that obtains or preserves New York residents’ confidential information regardless of where that business is located. New York’s expanding protection serves as yet another reminder of the importance of corporate cyber-resilience.
In 2005, New York enacted the “Information Security Breach and Notification Act.” (“Notification Act”). As with other states throughout the country, the New York State legislature recognized the significant adverse impact of data security breaches as well as identity theft, and further recognized that New York residents were “hindered by a lack of information regarding breaches. . . .” Accordingly, the state legislature enacted the Notification Act to ensure that New York residents are properly informed in the event of a data breach, as such information would empower residents to implement measures designed to repair damage and, if possible, prevent future damage from a data breach. More »
CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: Will This Become a National Trend? Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules That Employers Have a Legal Duty to Protect Employees' Electronic Data
Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in Dittman v. UPMC, ruled that employers have a have a legal duty to exercise reasonable care to safeguard employees’ electronically stored personal information. The dispute in Dittman arose after a data breach at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (“UPMC”) impacted 62,000 employees. Hackers accessed UPMC’s computer system, and stole employees’ personal and financial information including birth dates, social security numbers, tax forms, addresses and bank account information. More »
Illinois Appellate Court Concludes that Actual Harm is not Required under Biometric Information Privacy Act
An Illinois appellate court’s recent opinion may very well open the flood gates for litigation arising out of alleged violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) by eliminating the need to allege actual harm to have standing to sue. Sekura v. Krishna Schaumburg Tan, Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 180175. More »
DATA BREACH LITIGATION UPDATE: District Court Judge Rejects Remijas Settlement and Decertifies Class
A judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has dealt the latest blow to a consumer class seeking recovery from Neiman Marcus following the 2013 exposure of credit card information, as the result of a data breach. On September 17, 2018, Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman decertified the class and rejected a $1.6 million settlement reached between the class and Neiman Marcus Group LLC. More »
The risk of a cyber-attack is not just a “big business” problem. Due to the media’s reporting, many organizations have the impression that large companies – such as Target and Experian – are the only victims of cyber hacks and breaches. This line of thinking, however, is inconsistent with industry data, which demonstrates that small and mid-size companies are, in fact, vulnerable to this risk.
Companies of all sizes, large and small, must ask themselves whether competitors are trying to steal their trade secrets, whether companies or others are interested in their intellectual property, and whether their business contracts make them a target for a security breach. The regulatory and litigation costs associated with a data breach are monumental and, in some cases – especially those involving small or mid-sized companies – can be catastrophic. It therefore behooves every company, regardless of size, to create an effective strategy for managing and minimizing the risk of a cyber event.
There is no cookie cutter approach to managing this risk, and a cyber risk management strategy must be tailored to a company’s specific needs. As discussed below, best practices provide that a company must assess and address its cyber risk, and engage in additional activities in order to effectively manage this risk. More »
The battle over standing in cyber-security litigation continues. . . .
The latest example appears to be related to a data-breach involving the Hudson Bay Company. Founded in 1670, the Hudson Bay Company is one of the oldest companies in North America. On April 1, 2018 it joined the ever growing list of corporations that have been victimized by cyber-security breaches. Specifically, the Hudson Bay Company, which is the corporate parent of luxury department stores Saks Fifth Avenue, Saks Off 5th, and Lord & Taylor, posted a statement on its company web pages explaining that it had become aware of a data security issue involving customer payment data at certain North American stores. The statement goes on to inform customers that Hudson Bay Company is working with security investigators regarding the breach. On April 2nd, the statement was updated to reassure customers that there was no indication that social security numbers, drivers licenses numbers, and pins had been compromised, and that the company was conducting a diligent investigation to gain an understanding of the scope of the breach. More »
CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: The Circuit Split Continues When It Comes to Standing in Cybersecurity Litigation
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert in Recent Case in Which The D.C. Circuit Concluded That “Risk of Future Harm” Is Sufficient to Prove Standing
Federal Circuit Courts will remain split on what constitutes a “concrete injury” sufficient to establish standing in cybersecurity litigation after the Supreme Court recently denied certification of an appeal from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in Attias v. CareFirst, Inc. On August 1, 2017, a three-judge panel in the D.C. Circuit issued a unanimous decision stating that the risk of future harm is sufficient to establish Article III standing in data breach cases. This decision serves as the latest ruling in a continued split among circuit courts across the nation. The District Court’s holding is now final, as the U.S. Supreme Court denied certification on February 20, 2018. More »
Last Friday, a “50-State” complaint was filed against credit reporting giant Equifax concerning an extensive data breach that occurred earlier this year, and which exposed the personal identification and financial information of more than 145 million Americans. This summer, hackers took advantage of a flaw in a software tool utilized by Equifax, and obtained enormous amounts of sensitive customer data. The company has since admitted that it knew about this flaw at least two months before the breach occurred, and at least three months before it alerted consumers of the breach. The lawsuit contends that Equifax failed to improve data safeguards while expanding into new business areas. The lawsuit also alleges that Equifax mishandled its response to the breach, and alleges violation of breach notification laws in states throughout the country. Plaintiffs’ class-action lawsuit seeks recovery of millions of dollars in compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages, disgorgement of profits and attorneys’ fees. More »
The risk of a cyber-attack is ubiquitous, and a cyber-event can result in legal and financial liabilities that can cripple an affected organization. Recognizing the ever growing threat of cyber-crime, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) recently unveiled the Proposed Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies, a proposed set of cybersecurity regulations for banks, insurers and financial institutions aimed to protect both institutions and individuals from cybersecurity events. Compliance with the regulations is mandatory. The regulations, which take effect January 1, 2017, seek to protect customer information as well as institutions’ information technology systems by requiring covered entities to assess their cyber risk, to implement programs and policies to address that risk, and to continually monitor these systems. This alert will cover the ins and outs of the new regulations including what you can do today. More »
By now, most people have heard of the Target hack, which potentially compromised 40 million credit and debit card numbers as well as 70 million other records, including names, addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers of Target shoppers.i However, what many people do not know is how the retail giant was breached in such spectacular fashion (and the answer may surprise you). This breach highlights the critical importance of business vendor management. More »
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: The Constitutional Argument Against BIPA
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: The SHIELD Act Requires Corporations to Implement Cyber-Security Measures
- New Michigan DIFS Order Raises More Questions for Auto Insurers
- Proposed Hours of Service Rules: Balancing Safety and Economy
- Ninth Circuit Holds BIPA Class-Action Plaintiffs Have Article III Standing
- PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: Attorney Liability Under the FDCPA
- Five Words & Phrases Defense Attorneys Should be Mindful of in Trucking Litigation
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: BIPA Cutbacks Stalled in Springfield - For Now.
- PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: The Development of Michigan's Attorney Judgment Rule
- Another BIPA Violation Alleged in Illinois
- Professional Liability
- Class Action
- Insurance & Reinsurance Litigation & Counseling
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Insurance Coverage
- Cyber Risk & Liability
- Toxic Tort
- Professional Development
- Medical Negligence & Healthcare Liability
- Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Litigation
- Product Liability
- Construction Litigation & Counseling
- Employment Litigation & Counseling
- Discrimination, Harassment & Hostile Workplace Claims
- Social Media & Privacy
- Workers' Compensation