Dinesh U. Dadlani
ddadlani@smsm.com
201.209.0307
Dinesh U. Dadlani is a trial attorney focusing his practice on the defense of corporations, construction companies and a bi-state municipal agency, in personal injury …
Showing 1 post by Dinesh U. Dadlani.
Fowler v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al.: Defendant's Summary Judgement Reversed on Appeal in New Jersey Asbestos Case
Late last week, the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey handed down a reversal of summary judgment in an action sure to get the attention of asbestos defendants in the region who rely on similar offerings in moving for summary judgment. In an unpublished opinion, the Court in Fowler v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al.(Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, Docket No. A-2300-15T4), relied on, and hence gave credence to, limitations earlier courts have placed on the ‘substantial factor’ test used to determine if defendant’s product caused plaintiff’s disease. More »
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Follow us on TwitterRecent Posts
- New Illinois Workers’ Compensation Legislation: Unconstitutional If Applied Retroactively
- TRANSPORTATION LAW CLIENT ALERT: City of Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan’s Lawsuit Challenging the Michigan No-Fault Act’s Constitutionality Gains Traction
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: Actual Harm is not Necessary Under BIPA
- Judge Grants First Summary Judgment Based on Medical Causation in NY County Asbestos Litigation
- TRANSPORTATION LAW CLIENT ALERT: The Supreme Court’s Decision in New Prime v. Oliveira
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: Will This Become a National Trend? Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules That Employers Have a Legal Duty to Protect Employees' Electronic Data
- PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY CLIENT ALERT: Application of Judgmental Immunity in Illinois
- REAL ESTATE CLIENT ALERT: Michigan Court of Appeals Held That Non-Tenants May Not Sue Landlords Under Common Theories of Liability
- Illinois Appellate Court Concludes that Actual Harm is not Required under Biometric Information Privacy Act
- CYBER RISK CLIENT ALERT: What Companies can Learn from Uber’s Recent $148 Million Settlement
Topics
- Professional Liability
- Class Action
- Insurance & Reinsurance Litigation & Counseling
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Insurance Coverage
- Reinsurance
- Appellate
- Cyber Risk & Liability
- Toxic Tort
- Asbestos
- Professional Development
- Construction Litigation & Counseling
- Pharmaceutical & Medical Device Litigation
- Transportation
- Social Media & Privacy
- Workers' Compensation
- Trucking
- Employment Litigation & Counseling
- Discrimination, Harassment & Hostile Workplace Claims
- Medical Negligence & Healthcare Liability
- Product Liability
- Warranty
