
John A. LaBoon
Shareholder512.651.0290
512.476.7832 (fax)
jlaboon@smsm.com
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800
Austin, TX 78701
Download vCard
Print PDFSince 1993, Mr. LaBoon has focused his trial practice on tort defense with an emphasis in asbestos and silica litigation involving products liability, contractor liability and premises liability claims. Over the past 20 years, he has developed substantial experience in the state-of-the-art defense, medical causation and epidemiology.
Mr. LaBoon represents numerous manufacturers, premises owners and construction contractors in asbestos and silica cases. He currently serves as National Coordinating Counsel for a respirator manufacturer in silica cases across the country. He has served as state trial counsel for multiple asbestos defendants and was part of the national trial team for two major asbestos manufacturers. As lead and co-counsel, Mr. LaBoon obtained defense verdicts in numerous asbestos personal injury and wrongful death cases, as well as general personal injury and products liability cases across Texas.
In addition to his extensive toxic tort practice, Mr. LaBoon has represented clients in many other types of litigation including personal injury, products liability, medical devices, clinical drug trials, trucking accidents, medical malpractice, construction defect and employment discrimination cases. He has defended manufacturers of stoves, washing machines, oxygen concentrators and other products in fire-cause-and-origin cases. Mr. LaBoon counseled a Fortune 100 multi-national company in products liability lawsuits for claims involving personal injury, wrongful death and property damage related to household appliances, commercial equipment and medical devices. He has also represented hospitals, physicians and nurses involved in medical malpractice litigation and has defended insureds and self-insured companies in employment cases involving claims of wrongful termination and employment discrimination.
Mr. LaBoon has considerable experience defending general personal injury and wrongful death cases, and he has defended a governmental transit authority in personal injury and death lawsuits filed pursuant to the Texas Tort Claims Act.
REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS
- In June 2012, won a defense verdict for a product manufacturer in a wrongful death case where claim was that decedent drowned as a result of carbon monoxide poisoning. The plaintiff sought nearly $13 million in actual and punitive damages.
- Utilities Optimization Group, L.L.C. v. TIN, Inc., d/b/a Temple-Inland, Case No. 10-40471 (United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit, August 8, 2011) - Achieved a reversal of adverse jury verdict with a rendered judgment in favor of client in a commercial contract dispute arising in Texas. The U.S. Court of Appeals held that there was insufficient evidence of actual or apparent authority to bind Temple-Inland to changes made in scope of work by a contractor. A copy of the Fifth Circuit's opinion can be found here. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in March 2012.
EDUCATION
Texas Christian University, B.B.A., 1989
Southern Methodist University, M.B.A., 1990
University of Houston, J.D., 1993
BAR ADMISSIONS
State Bar of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Eastern, Southern, Northern and Western Districts of Texas
U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. District Court for Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania - MDL 875
PROFESSIONAL AND CIVIC INVOLVEMENT
American Bar Association
Children's Fund of Houston, (2001-2004)
Defense Research Institute
Lighthouse for the Blind of Houston, Board of Directors, (1998-2004)
Texas Association of Defense Counsel
Texas Bar Association
TIBH Industries, Board of Directors (2012-present)
Travis County Bar Association
SPEECHES AND PUBLICATIONS
Author
Co-Author
- "State Update: Texas," Segal McCambridge's Toxic Tort Newsletter (Winter 2010-2011).
- "Asbestos: Selected Cancers - Recent NIH Study on 'Non-Traditional' Cancers," For The Defense (April 2007).
Contributor
-
"Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts and Tort Compensation," by Lloyd Dixon and Geoffrey McGovern, RAND Corporation (2011).
Speaker
-
DRI - Asbestos Medicine Seminar, San Diego, CA, "The Epidemiology of the Other Cancers - A Review of the IOM/NIH Study" (November 8-9, 2007).
-
Mealey's - National Asbestos Superconference, Scottsdale, AZ, "Mock Trial: Duty to Warn for External Insulation" (September 26-28, 2007).
-
Harris Martin's - Texas Asbestos & Silica Litigation Conference, Houston, TX, "Ramifications of Bankruptcy Trust Submissions" (March 28, 2007).
-
Mealey's - The New Face of Asbestos Litigation Conference, Washington D.C., "Dynamic Trial & Settlement Techniques" (February 8-9, 2007).
-
DRI - Asbestos Medicine Seminar, Las Vegas, NV, "Hot Topics - Liability for External Insulation" (October 26-27, 2006).
-
Mealey's - Fundamentals of Asbestos Conference, Philadelphia, PA, "Jumping into the Jury Pool - Getting your Feet Wet in Jury Selection" (February 13-14, 2006).
-
Texas State Bar - 18th Annual Advanced Personal Injury Law Course, "Daubert Challenges" Dallas, Texas, (July 11, 2002).
-
Texas State Bar - 11th Annual Advanced Personal Injury Law Course, "Jurisdiction, Venue and Forum Selection" Ft. Worth, Texas, (August 4, 1995).
PUBLISHED APPELLATE OPINIONS
Hickman v. Metropolitan Transit Authority, 897 F.Supp. 955, 958 (S.D. Tex. 1995)
Keller v. Owens Corning Fiberglas, 14-94-00957, (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 1996)
Kiefer v. Spring Shadow Glen, 934 S.W.2d 785 (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 1996)
Coastal Transport v. Crown Central, 20 S.W.3d 119 (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2000)
Sneed v. Cryolife, Inc., 01-05-00425, (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2006)
Utilities Optimization Group, L.L.C. v. TIN, Inc., d/b/a Temple-Inland, 440 Fed. Appx. 249 (5th Cir. 2011)
OTHER HONORS
Martindale-Hubbell AV-Rated

Practice Areas
Recent News, Articles & Publications
This issue covers a wide range of hot topics. Our victory in the case of Nolan v. Weil signals the death of the Lipke Rule.
The purpose of the Toxic Tort Newsletter is to present the latest information to our readers on
In this edition of the Toxic Tort Newsletter, we report on some interesting state decisions favorable
Did the plaintiff's attorney realize that he was unleashing the longest running mass tort litigation in U.S. history when he filed
This issue of The Toxic Tort Newsletter contains the second part of David Walter's comprehensive review of MTBE litigation and
Despite the fact that there have been numerous defense verdicts in welding rod litigation over the past 15 years, the cases continue to be filed. In this edition of the Toxic Tort Newsletter, we examine the status of the litigation, the related epidemiology and the future of the litigation.
As the United States Congress contemplated creating a trust fund to compensate individuals suffering from asbestos-related diseases
The universe of toxic tort litigation keeps expanding. New claims for all types of expsures are on the rise. In this edition, we explore a number of new claims.
In August 2006, the Institute of Medicine released "Asbestos: Selected Cancers." The study was written by the Committee on Asbestos: Selected Health Effects Board on Population Health and Public Health Practices. This committee is comprised
Our fall issue contains information that will bring you up-to-date on some of the topics in the Toxic Tort universe. I present the status on the case of Nolan v. Weil McLain, which challenges the Lipke Rule in Illinois.
Numerous cases have been filed across the country alleging that a plaintiff's cancer is the result of exposure to a product or substance that
How many times has it been suggested to you that one of those mysterious FOIA searches be done for government documents. The red tape and procedures that must
Toxic tort litigation presents difficult and interesting new challenges. It is a field that changes at an ever-increasing rate and requires specialized knowledge to manage
Toxic tort litigation presents difficult and interesting new challenges. It is a field that changes at an ever-increasing rate and requires specialized knowledge to manage it effectively.
The testimony of an industrial hygienist has become an integral part of a toxic tort case . A trained industrial hygienist can develop information that creates
Toxic tort litigation presents difficult and interesting new challenges. It is a field that changes at an ever-increasing rate and requires specialized knowledge to manage it effectively.
Toxic tort litigation presents difficult and interesting new challenges. It is a field that changes at an ever-increasing rate and requires specialized knowledge to manage it effectively.
